Belgium · Article 10/2 of the Belgian Law of 30 July 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data, read with Article 125 of the Electronic Communications Act of 13 June 2005

Cookie consent in Belgium: Article 10/2 and the APD rules

In Belgium, Article 10/2 of the data protection law of 30 July 2018 requires consent before any cookie or tracker that is not strictly necessary is stored or read, and the Data Protection Authority (APD in French, GBA in Dutch) enforces it with the GDPR's consent rules. Its checklist says a banner with an Accept all button must have a Reject all button on the same layer, cookie walls are not allowed, and the cookie that stores the visitor's choice should in principle last 6 months. Analytics cookies generally need consent, and the authority has fined publishers and ordered news sites to change their banners.
Published 21 October 2026 · By the Cookiequiet team · Markdown

Quick facts

Applies toWebsites, apps and other services that store or read information on the devices of subscribers or users in Belgium
Consent modelPrior opt-in with the GDPR's definition of consent; no consent from continued browsing, closing the banner or browser settings
Cookie ruleArticle 10/2 of the Law of 30 July 2018, inserted by the Law of 21 December 2021 and in force since 10 January 2022 (previously Article 129 of the Electronic Communications Act of 13 June 2005)
AuthorityAutorité de protection des données / Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (APD/GBA); decisions by its Litigation Chamber, appeals to the Market Court in Brussels
Maximum fineGDPR scale, because the APD assesses cookie consent under Articles 6 and 7 GDPR: up to 20 million euros or 4% of worldwide annual turnover (Article 83(5)); orders can carry daily penalty payments
Reject on first layerYes when Accept all is there: APD cookie checklist; a Settings button next to Accept all is not enough
Choice cookie lifetime6 months is in principle reasonable for the cookie that stores the visitor's preferences (APD checklist and cookie page)

Belgium transposed Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive first in Article 129 of the Electronic Communications Act of 13 June 2005. The Law of 21 December 2021 moved the rule, with effect from 10 January 2022, into Article 10/2 of the Law of 30 July 2018, Belgium's framework law on personal data, which refers to Article 125 of the 2005 Act. The cookie rule now sits in the data protection framework law that the Data Protection Authority applies.

Article 10/2 allows storing information on, or accessing information in, the terminal equipment of a subscriber or user only if the person receives clear and precise information about the purposes of the processing and their rights under the GDPR, and has consented after receiving it. Two cases are exempt: technical storage or access whose only purpose is to send a communication over an electronic communications network, and what is strictly necessary to provide a service the subscriber or user expressly requested.

The APD's checklist makes clear that "cookies" covers the whole family of trackers: pixels, device fingerprinting, local storage and tracking inside mobile apps.

The APD published a cookie checklist and a page on cookies and other trackers. Its main points:

  • No tracker before consent. No cookie that is not strictly necessary may be placed or read before valid consent.
  • Reject next to Accept. Do not offer an "accept all" button without a "reject all non-essential cookies" button on the same level. The checklist says a "Settings" button next to "Accept all" is not enough, and gives as the good example "Reject all" and "Accept all" displayed in the same way.
  • No deceptive design, such as steering visitors with color.
  • Specific consent. At the latest on a second layer, visitors must be able to consent purpose by purpose and, where relevant, partner by partner. Own advertising and third-party advertising are separate purposes, as are social sharing buttons and ad personalization.
  • Informed consent. The first layer must state the purposes clearly, who places or reads the cookies, how to accept or refuse, the consequences of each choice, and how to withdraw consent. A lower layer lists every cookie with its purpose, lifetime and recipients.
  • Active consent. No consent is inferred from continued browsing, closing the banner, inactivity, accepting terms and conditions, or browser settings. Pre-ticked boxes are excluded on every layer.
  • Easy withdrawal, for example through a clearly visible link or button that lets visitors withdraw in one click, with real effect on the cookies already placed.
  • Accountability. Keep earlier versions of the banner and of the cookie policy, with a date and version number.

How long can a choice be remembered?

The APD considers that a lifetime of 6 months is in principle reasonable for the cookie that stores the visitor's preferences. After that the visitor is asked again. Other cookies that are exempt from consent should expire as soon as they are no longer needed.

No. The APD's checklist tells site owners not to use cookie walls, citing the EDPB's consent guidelines: access to a service must not depend on accepting trackers, and refusing cookies must not lead to a denial of service.

In principle, yes. The APD says that an analytics cookie does not in principle meet the strict necessity exemption, because it serves to send statistics to the site owner rather than to provide the service the visitor asked for. In its Roularta decision of 25 May 2022 the Litigation Chamber held that "statistical" cookies cannot generally be considered strictly necessary. Belgium has no French-style analytics exemption, so Google Analytics and similar tools wait for consent. See analytics without consent for the options that store no identifier.

What enforcement has there been in Belgium?

The APD runs cookie enforcement through its Inspection Service and its Litigation Chamber, applying Article 10/2 together with the GDPR's consent conditions:

  • Roularta, 25 May 2022 (decision 85/2022): 50,000 euros. First decision of an inspection of 20 of the most visited Belgian press websites. On levif.be and knack.be, about sixty non-essential cookies were placed before consent, third-party consent boxes were pre-ticked, information was insufficient, and withdrawing consent was harder than giving it.
  • Mediahuis, 6 September 2024 (decision 113/2024). On a complaint brought with noyb about De Standaard, Het Nieuwsblad, Gazet van Antwerpen and Het Belang van Limburg, the Litigation Chamber ordered a reject option on every layer where "accept all" appears and non-misleading button colors, within 45 days, with penalty payments of 25,000 euros per day per order and per website. The Market Court annulled the decision on 19 March 2025 on procedural grounds: it found that the complaint, organized by noyb through one of its trainees, was an abuse of the right to complain. The ruling did not overturn the APD's reading of what a banner must contain, which its checklist still states.

The Belgian authority also decided the case against IAB Europe over the Transparency and Consent Framework (250,000 euros, 2 February 2022), covered on the GDPR page.

Which languages should a Belgian banner use?

Belgium has three official languages: Dutch, French and German. Article 10/2 and the checklist do not name a language, but they require information that is clear, precise and concise, which a visitor only gets in a language they read. A site with visitors from several language communities therefore shows the banner and the cookie information in each of their languages.

How does Cookiequiet fit Belgian rules?

Setting up Cookiequiet takes one script tag and about five minutes: the scan fills the cookie table, Reject all and Accept all are shown the same way on the first layer by default, and the banner speaks French, Dutch or German depending on the visitor's browser. Every choice goes into a consent log with its date, banner version and language. Run the free cookie scanner to see which trackers load before consent.

Questions

Since 10 January 2022 it is Article 10/2 of the Law of 30 July 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. Before that, the rule was in Article 129 of the Electronic Communications Act of 13 June 2005. Both transpose Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive.
Yes, if it has an Accept all button. The APD's checklist says not to offer Accept all without a Reject all non-essential cookies button on the same level, and that a Settings button next to Accept all is not enough. Both buttons should be displayed in the same way.
The APD considers 6 months reasonable in principle for the cookie that stores the visitor's cookie preferences. After that period the site asks again.
Yes, on procedure. On 19 March 2025 the Market Court annulled decision 113/2024 because it found the complaint organized by noyb was an abuse of the right to complain. The court did not rule that a banner without a Reject all button is lawful, and the APD's checklist still requires one next to Accept all.

Put a quiet banner on your website today

Free for one website with every core feature, no card and no trial clock. Upgrade a website to Starter for $3 a month to match your brand with AI and drop the branding, or to Pro for $9 to design it with the AI agent.